|
Bug Notes |
|
|
|
I guess there is some note in the source concerning to this ;-)
Something marked as "TODO" or so...
I will take care of this.
edited on: 2004-11-28 23:42 |
|
|
|
|
Now I made up my mind I'm not sure about this...
This could make several problems in ['values'] or better in ['values2']. For example someone would like to store pipe character "|" into database, so he or she would use:
['values2'] => array(
'barfoo|1' => 'Bar Foo',
'barfoo|2' => 'Another Bar Foo',
...
)
Hm? |
|
|
|
|
|
so he/she would have to use 'barfoo\|1' (escaping special character) (i hope that's possible to implement) |
|
|
|
hbernard
|
|
2004-11-29 14:41
|
|
|
What about just exclude 'values2' from the scan ? |
|
|
|
|
|
The question is, if 'values2' is the only option which has to be excluded during scan... |
|
|
|
hbernard
|
|
2004-12-28 08:55
|
|
Yes, I think values2 is the only case where the _keys_ of a sub-array are _user-defined_.
Others keys are API-defined, or implicit integers (like in values).
Correct me if I am wrong |
|